Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffers v. Unknown Kerr County Sheriff Officer et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Martin Jeffers
Defendant:
Unknown Kerr County Sheriff Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Ector County Detention Center
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dwayne Bailey
Defendant:
Ector County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Sheriff
as 1:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jeffery W Smith
Defendant:
Ellis County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Williams et al
as 6:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Edward Dewayne Hawkins
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Williams, Officer FNU Avilas, Officer FNU Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liller v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2021cv00239
Petitioner:
Robert Jeffery Liller
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pool v. CitiBank
as 5:2021cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lamont Pool
Defendant:
Citibank and T.D.C.J. Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2021cv01024
Defendant:
Thompson Prometric, U.S. Attorney General, Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00428
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Tolson v. Anderson et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D. Tolson
Defendant:
Billy Ray Stubblefield, Justices of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Stacy Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
