Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Tanner v. Metabank (Pathward) et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Tanner
Defendant:
Metabank (Pathward), Internal Revenue Service, Pathward and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
Perry v. Franklin et al
as 1:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry
Defendant:
Melissa Franklin, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01152
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stone v. Smith
as 1:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone
Respondent:
Jimmy S. Smith, Internal Revenue Service and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schubert v. Mnuchin et al
as 1:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Allan Schubert
Defendant:
Steven Mnuchin and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00329
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reese v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kenneth Reese
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Francis
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2021cv00597
Plaintiff:
Darrell Horton
Defendant:
Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
