Cases 1 - 10 of 908
Canales v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00862
Petitioner:
Ramiro Canales
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Ruth E. Trice, Rolando Cerda, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanson v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Hanson
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Cris Love, Kim Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Thaler
as 5:2016cv00142
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David G. Harris
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Velez v. Thaler et al
as 5:2016cv00132
Defendant:
FNU LNU and Rick Thaler
Plaintiff:
George Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Thaler et al
as 5:2016cv00066
Defendant:
Jesus M. Peralta and Rick Thaler
Plaintiff:
Gary Eugene Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Thaler
as 6:2015cv00197
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Rumph v. Thaler
as 5:2015cv00089
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Rumph
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGowen v. Livingston et al
as 1:2015cv00070
Defendant:
Sr Warden FNU Grey, Major FNU Hooten, OIG Investigator FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kent McGowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGowen v. Livingston et al
as 6:2015cv00027
Defendant:
Sr Warden Edgar Baker, OIG Lieutenant Jerry Bell, Asst Warden L. Berger and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kent McGowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGowen v. Livingston et al
as 1:2015cv00069
Defendant:
Sr Warden Edgar Baker, OIG Lieutenant Jerry Bell, Asst Warden L. Berger and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kent McGowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
