Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rowe v. AISD Ted Cruz
as 1:2021cv00342
Defendant:
AISD Ted Cruz
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lee Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rico v. Yelley
as 3:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ruben Luis Rico
Defendant:
Ted Yelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rico v. Yelley
as 7:2019cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ruben Luis Rico
Defendant:
Ted Yelley and Odessa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Decker v. Stephens et al
as 1:2016cv00256
Plaintiff:
Kurby G Decker
Defendant:
Ira Evans, David Gutierrez, Stuart Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chapa et al
as 3:2013cv00208
Respondent:
Ted Bonnell, Rachel Chapa, Sandra Hijar and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Gary Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hoffman v. Thaler et al
as 5:2011cv01083
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Aramark Corporation, Lieutenent FNU Baldey and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Hoffman
Amicu:
Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Thaler
as 5:2011cv00276
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ted Hopkins Roberts
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Thaler
as 5:2011cv00208
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ted Hopkins Roberts
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2010cv00811
Defendant:
FNU Borrows, City of San Antonio, Ted Michael Grill and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brant Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Grill et al
as 5:2010cv00092
Defendant:
FNU Borrows, Ted Michael Grill and Pamela A. Henderson
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brant Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
