Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nichols v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00916
Plaintiff:
Nicole Nichols
Defendant:
Global Experience Specialists, Inc., City of Austin, Edward Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 5:2020cv00766
Defendant:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
Micheal Garcia, Diego Alejandro Diaz, Edwin Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Kortni Hoover
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Joseph A. Navarro v. VIA Metropolitan Transit
as 5:2018cv00724
Defendant:
VIA Metropolitan Transit
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Navarro v. Denny's, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00657
Plaintiff:
Michele Navarro
Defendant:
Denny's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Martinez v. Navarros Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01170
Plaintiff:
Adalberto Martinez
Defendant:
Angel Navarro, Korin Navarro, Miguel A. Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Douglas Moneypenny, et al v. Redback Energy Services, et al
as 5:2017cv00774
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Adams, Skyler Anderson, William Bonnell D'Arienzo and others
Defendant:
Dante Domenichelli, David Droke, Mike Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Kreucher v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 1:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Willow Anita Kreucher
Defendant:
Jaime Martinez, Neilyn Navarro, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Navarro v. FreshPoint South Texas, L.P. et al
as 5:2014cv00597
Defendant:
FreshPoint South Texas, L.P. and Amrah Massave
Plaintiff:
Jose Raul Navarro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Navarro v. The Home Depot Texas Employee Accident Plan et al
as 5:2011cv00249
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc. and The Home Depot Texas Employee Accident Plan
Plaintiff:
Tomas Navarro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
