Cases 11 - 20 of 24
In Re: Gisela Gomez-Machado
as 2:2016mc00180
In Re:
Gisela Gomez-Machado
Respondent:
Lizbeth Hansen
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Ristow v. Hansen et al
as 5:2016cv00999
Defendant:
Marc Bane, Manuel Casas and Michael Hansen
Plaintiff:
Scott Ristow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hansen v. Corridor Medical Services, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00890
Defendant:
Corridor Medical Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hansen v. Alamo Mobile X-Ray & EKG Services, Inc.
as 5:2014cv01070
Defendant:
Alamo Mobile X-Ray & EKG Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Clephas v. Hansen Beverage Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00334
Defendant:
Austin Partners, LLC, Jey Ditta, Kirk Franceschini and others
Plaintiff:
Josh Clephas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Hansen v. Bekins Van Lines, L.L.C.
as 5:2012cv00793
Defendant:
Bekins Van Lines, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Telford et al v. Lyon et al
as 6:2010cv00154
Defendant:
American Fork City, Dee Benson, Doe Bop and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Christenson, Holli Telford and Marti Telford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams v. Hansen et al
as 3:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
William C. Williams
Defendant:
Uel Hansen, Leah Ochoa and Miguel Pirela-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ayers et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
Robert Ayers, Jill Ayers, John Baker and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
