Cases 201 - 210 of 74,361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bailey v. Albright
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Judge Alan D. Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00488
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hetzer, et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., et al.
as 5:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Adriana Hetzer, Darrell Hetzer, Jamie Ramos and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co. and The Personal Representative and/or Statutory Heir of the Estate of Robert Hetzer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tryon v. Bell County Law Enforcement Center
as 6:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Monee Tryon
Defendant:
Bell County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
