Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Steele v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Larry R Steele
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haugen v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 7:2022cv00014
Petitioner:
Amber Lynn Haugen
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oatman v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2021cv01177
Plaintiff:
Brian G. Oatman
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Brian Collier, Dr. Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Marcello LaCraig Gibbs
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Phonso J. Rayford, John A. Marcum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
John Alfred Grimes
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Cause #007-1311-14, Bobby D. Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv00677
Plaintiff:
Damian Walker
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Fonso Rayford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Collier
as 1:2021cv00416
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Carlos Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. TDCJ et al
as 3:2021cv00059
Respondent:
Brian Collier and John McDaniel
Petitioner:
Henry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Pinney et al
as 6:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Pinney, Sgt. James Vanderpool, John Doe (1 thru 32) and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Miles Hastings, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
