Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Grant, et al v. Everest Reinsurance, et al
as 5:2019cv00232
Plaintiff:
MARY GRANT and STEPHEN GRANT
Defendant:
ALLIED NATIONAL, INC., EVEREST REINSURANCE and HEALTH PLAN INTERMEDIARIES HOLDINGS, LLC dba HEALTH INSURANCE INNOVATIONS
Diamondback Industries, Inc. v. Repeat Precision, LLC, et al
as 6:2019cv00034
Defendant:
RJ Macine Company, Inc., Advent International Corporation, Robert Nipper and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Repeat Precision, LLC
Plaintiff:
Diamondback Industries, Inc.
Perry v. City of Llano, Texas et al
as 1:2018cv00767
Plaintiff:
Cody Perry
Defendant:
Melissa Sloan, City of Llano, Texas, Matthew Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Grant v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 6:2018cv00163
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 2:2018cv00039
Defendant:
William Lee Grant, II and U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. U.S. Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bre Grant, et al v. Rent A Center, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00573
Plaintiff:
Angela Browning, Edward Browning and Bre Grant
Defendant:
Rent A Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Smith v. Gentiva Health Care et al
as 1:2018cv00289
Defendant:
Adult Protective Services, Ashley Burns, Wade Chiles and others
Plaintiff:
Edward DeShan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Headifen v. Paxton
as 1:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
Grant Rawston Headifen
Defendant:
Attorney General Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
