Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Collins v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Derrick Deshon Collins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lynch v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00810
Petitioner:
Derrick Lynch
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sawyer v. Myers
as 1:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sawyer
Defendant:
Derrick Braden Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rose, et al v. Grappler Pressure Pumping, LLC.
as 7:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rose, Derrick Boyd, Roberto Castaneda and others
Defendant:
Grappler Pressure Pumping, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102 WARN Act (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lynch v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
Derrick Lynch
Respondent:
Michael Alsobrook and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Quinn
as 6:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
Peter Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
