Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Rethink35 et al v. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Rethink35, Save Our Springs Alliance, Austin Justice Coalition and others
Defendant:
Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), Marc Williams, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Sierra Club v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 1:2012cv00116
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Hon. Victor M. Mendez, Texas Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas v. Federal Highway Administration
as 5:2010cv00708
Defendant:
Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, Terry Brechtel, Federal Highway Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
May v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Vincent Joseph May
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Texas Department of Transportation, Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas et al v. US Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas, Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas, Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom and others
Defendant:
US Federal Highway Administration, Amadeo Saenz, Jr. and Terry Brechtel
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kyle et al v. Brown et al
as 5:2007cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jacquelynn R. Kyle, Jacquelynn R. Kyle, Kathryn Kyle and others
Defendant:
Janice W. Brown, Janice W. Brown, J. Richard Capka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.