Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01378
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis v. Hierholzer et al
as 5:2020cv01246
Plaintiff:
John Rogers Ellis
Defendant:
Scott Monroe, W.R. "Rusty" Hierholzer, Robbin Burlew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01036
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robbin Minica v. Signify North America Corporation
as 5:2020cv00444
Plaintiff:
Robbin Minica
Defendant:
SIGNIFY NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Walker et al v. TaskUs, Inc.
as 5:2019cv01309
Plaintiff:
Van Robbins, Victoria Mayweathers and Erica Walker
Defendant:
TaskUs, Inc. and TaskUS USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robbins Place West Campus, LLC v. Mid-Century Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robbins Place West Campus, LLC
Defendant:
Jillian Megan Sherman and Mid-Century Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 1:2018mc00647
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 6:2018mc00219
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
United States of North America et al v. Burlew et al
as 5:2018cv00520
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ables, A. William Arnold, III, Bank of New York Mellon and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Rebecca Cammack
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
