Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Duarte v. Romero et al
as 5:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Officer Wilson Romero, Officer FNU Rice, Medical Staff and Practitioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Romero et al
as 5:2022cv00479
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Officer Wilson Romero, Major of Corr. Christy N. Welman, Verneta Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Stengel et al
as 5:2021cv00885
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Frank Stengel, State of Texas, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00136
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt, LLC, J.B. Hunt Gas & Oil Drilling, LLC, Kevin Favant and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weens v. Stephens
as 5:2016cv00341
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Daniel James Weens
Respondent:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fletcher v. Williams
as 1:2014cv01095
Petitioner:
Jamie Fletcher, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagby v. Smith et al
as 5:2014cv00781
Defendant:
Abel Acosta, Sharon Y. Cha, Vanessa D. Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. William
as 1:2013cv01051
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Clifford Henry
Respondent:
Stephen William
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
