Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Matthews v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Renae Matthews
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Archer v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Archer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Glisson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Matthew C Glisson and Matthew Carlton Glisson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Booker v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Booker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Parker v. Saul
as 1:2019cv01191
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Matthew Parker
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cyr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Blake Cyr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
De Whitt-Matthews v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Kendall De Whitt-Matthews
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gautreau v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
Eric Matthew Gautreau
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lauritzen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00320
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Lauritzen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Matthew Moore
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
