Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Charles v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Defendant:
Bob Anderson, Anna Hammond, Amelia Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Employee of Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Employee of Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Respondent:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NaJacque v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. NaJacque
Defendant:
David W. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Najacque v. Anderson
as 3:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. Najacque
Defendant:
Trevor D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Najacque v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00835
Petitioner:
Leonard Wista Najacque
Defendant:
David Anderson, II
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strand v. Aderson
as 2:2023cv00688
Petitioner:
Evron T. Strand
Respondent:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Custis v. Anderson
as 2:2023cv00605
Petitioner:
Ryricka Nikita Custis
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
