Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Vick v. Temple et al
as 3:2024cv00662
Defendant:
Anthony Johnson, Sgt. Smith, Officer Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Dijon Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Walls et al
as 1:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anderson
Defendant:
Walls and P. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Younce et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, J. F. Harman, R. Hickman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dozier, Ashaun Ra and Ashann- Ra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles, et al. v. Chapman, et al.
as 1:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Lindsay McCarty, Heather Sabbatino, Ronald Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Anderson
as 1:2024cv01225
Respondent:
David E. Anderson
Petitioner:
Ta'Kuan Keontay Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Defendant:
Renee Hayes, Elizabeth Lancaster, Lorraine Goldberg and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00987
Defendant:
Bob Anderson, Loudoun County, Anthony Needham and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Employee of Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Employee of Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
