Cases 31 - 40 of 58
In Re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2015md02627
Plaintiff:
Dwight Spence, Tracie-Linn Tyrrell, Frank Graham and others
In Re:
In Re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Defendant:
EDLab Environmental Diagnostics Laboratory, Lumber Liquidators, Unknown Parties and others
Interested Party:
Brice M. Johnston and Diana Cantu-Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Application Of Green Development Corporation S.A. de C.V.
as 1:2015mc00012
Petitioner:
In Re: Application Of Green Development Corporation S.A. de C.V.
U.S. Bank National Association v. Jefferson At Laurel Highlands, L.P. et al
as 1:2015cv00306
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Jefferson At Laurel Highlands, L.P. and RES Multifamily Investments, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Application of Lazare Kaplan Belgium N.V.
as 1:2014mc00034
Plaintiff:
In re Application of Lazare Kaplan Belgium N.V.
Movant:
Lazare Kaplan Belgium N.V.
Respondent:
HSBC Bank USA, NA
Muench et al v. Hiong Guan Navegacion Co. Ltd., in personam
as 2:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Matthias Muench
Defendant:
M/V Balsa 85, her engines, tackle, equipment, appurtenances, etc., in rem, by substitute res: a certain Letter of Undertaking dated May 1, 2014 and Hiong Guan Navegacion Co. Ltd., in personam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
In Re Application of Halliburton SAS
as 1:2014mc00004
Defendant:
In Re Application of Halliburton SAS
In Re: Nonjudicial Civil Forfeiture, Richard Grant Pinto Et Al
as 1:2013mc00029
In Re:
In Re: Nonjudicial Civil Forfeiture
Claimant:
Richard Grant Pinto
In re: Electronically Stored Information Retained by LeClairRyan
as 3:2013mc00004
Petitioner:
In re: Electronically Stored Information Retained by LeClairRyan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
