Cases 41 - 50 of 794
Davis v. Pandya
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
Asha S. Pandya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Dental Department II Building
as 1:2023cv01282
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
Dental Department II Building
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Davis v. Carrow
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
William O. Carrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Norfolk Police Department
as 1:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
Norfolk Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Godfrey v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Rodetrick Lamont Godfrey
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jane Doe, Albert Vanderpool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson et al v. Dunn et al
as 1:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Hudson, Kameron Wisinger, Tanner Clifton and others
Defendant:
Ralph Wayne Dunn, Sherry Gossard, Lynnway Tank and Tower LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
