Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01024
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Lapham v. Trolley Pub of North Carolina, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lapham
Defendant:
Trolley Pub of North Carolina, LLC , Kaapro & Cole Ventures, LLC , Kai Kaapro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Wilson et al v. Alorica, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Mitch Wilson , Merle T. Rutledge, Jr. , Yolanda Gray and others
Defendant:
Alorica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Daoud Investment Holdings, Inc. et al v. Cole
as 2:2015cv00479
Plaintiff:
Daoud Investment Holdings, Inc. and Wadid Daoud
Defendant:
Richard T. Cole
Counter_claimant:
Richard T. Cole
Counter_defendant:
Wadid Daoud and Daoud Investment Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cole v. Daoud et al
as 2:2015cv00419
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Cole
Defendant:
Wadid Daoud, Daoud Investment Holdings, Inc. and Kent J. George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cephas et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cephas , Jamie Albert , Solange Cole and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Independent Printers Worldwide, Inc. et al v. Cole et al
as 3:2015cv00185
Defendant:
Scott T. Cole , Jerry Danielson , Mike S. Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Independent Printers Worldwide, Inc. and IPW Communications LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
