Cases 1 - 10 of 1,267
United Van Lines, LLC v. Roberts
as 1:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Lee Roberts
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Stanton et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Gilford Lee
Defendant:
D. Stanton, Warden Larry T. Edmonds and Reg. Administrator Adrian Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravenscroft v. Office of the Fredrick County Comissions et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Ravenscroft, Jr
Defendant:
Office of the Fredrick County Comissions, Office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth, Office of the Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Park v. Shin et al
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Seungho Park
Defendant:
Ellie Ilyoung Shin, THE QUI GAINESVILLE, LLC, THE QUI GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Baskerville v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Baskerville
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Richardson v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Lee Richardson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson-Buisson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00603
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson and Jeremy Leigh Watson-Buisson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monroe v. USA
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Monroe, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Evans Jr. v. VADOC
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
George Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
VADOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
