Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reeves v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 7:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Reeves
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crandell v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce et al
as 5:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
John Osborne Crandell, III
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Christopher Anderson, Andrew Fiddes and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hill v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brian David Hill
Defendant:
Glen Andrew Hall, Esq., Lauren McGarry, Esq., Matthew Scott Thomas Clark, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shelton v. RAB Performance Recoveries LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00071
Defendant:
Dominion Law Associates, Andrew Eichenbaum and RAB Performance Recoveries LLC
Plaintiff:
Missy Shelton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Colley v. Portfolio Recovery Assoc., LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00044
Defendant:
Larry Andrews, Deanna Hackworth, Christina Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Colley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Goldstein v. PHC-Martinsville, Inc.
as 4:2011mc00002
Interested Party:
Bankruptcy-Lynchburg
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Goldstein
Debtor:
Christine C. Huffman
Defendant:
PHC-Martinsville, Inc.
United States Of America v. Gupta
as 5:2011mc00005
Respondent:
Andrew K. Gupta
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Zimmerman et al v. Cambridge Credit Corp. et al
as 3:2009mc00026
Plaintiff:
Andrew Zimmerman and Kelly Zimmerman
Defendant:
Cambridge Credit Corp., John Puccio and Richard Puccio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
