Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Anderson v. Unknown
as 7:2023cv00631
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lamar Anderson
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Robinson, Gregory Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Anderson
as 7:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Williams and Michael Antoine Williams
Defendant:
David E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Carl A. Manis, J. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, D. Rose, Brian Vanover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pledger v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Niccokawon Pledger
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Kyle Rosch, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. USA
as 3:2023cv81527
Petitioner:
Christine Favara Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Neamo v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Mark L. Neamo
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Anderson and Tim Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drayton v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Drayton
Defendant:
Warden Daivd Anderson and Assist. Warden Bataman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
