Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Baker v. Coffeewood Correctional Center
as 7:2018cv00382
Defendant:
S. W. Rogers, Baldwin, S. L. Stull and others
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority- Lynchburg
as 7:2012cv00391
Defendant:
Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority- Lynchburg
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. USA
as 4:2012cv80483
Petitioner:
Ira Linell Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martin v. USA
as 7:2012cv00048
Petitioner:
Kendall Leshawn Martin
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coleman v. Jabe et al
as 7:2011cv00518
Defendant:
Major Batton, Robert Bivens, Lou Cei and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martins v. Akers et al
as 7:2011cv00252
Defendant:
Betty Akers, Mark Amonette, Dr. John Marsh and others
Plaintiff:
Oluyomi Martins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Clarke
as 7:2011cv00231
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Petitioner:
Shannon Lamar Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bardeau v. Mondul et al
as 7:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
Robert Theodore Bardeau
Defendant:
Steven Martin and Michael Mondul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Mathena et al
as 7:2011cv00010
Defendant:
Lester, R.C. Mathena, Fred Schilling and others
Plaintiff:
Viston Shyrock Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barr v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2010cv00485
Petitioner:
Martin Vanburen Barr, III
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Gene M. Johnson and Tracy Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
