Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Howard v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Eric Howard
Defendant:
Warden I. Hamilton, Unit Manager J. Collins, Director of Nursing A. E. Whitted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Clark
as 7:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Robert Mckinley Blankenship
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Howard Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Alexander Csaky Chase
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Michael McBride, B.S. Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Mathena, et al
as 7:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Rector, Tracy Mathena, Tim Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Anderson, et al
as 7:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
David Anderson, Tracy Mathena, Sgt. J. Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakur v. Sherwood et al
as 7:2022cv00645
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shakur
Defendant:
Sherwood, M. Breniger, May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moone v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00160
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Howard Moone
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodson v. Hanheimer et al
as 7:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Howard J. Manheimer and Mr. David L. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moone v. Herrick et al
as 7:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Howard Moone
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, Trey Fuller, Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
