Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Giles v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Phillip Michael Giles
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darr v. Stout et al
as 7:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
William Allen Darr, Jr.
Defendant:
C/O R. Stout, Harold W. Clarke and Warden Phillip White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClanahan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Blake McClanahan
Defendant:
Honorable Patrick Johnson, Phillip Justice, Jr. and Pebbles Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Trent et al
as 7:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Keith E. Moss
Defendant:
Tim Trent, Joshua Salmon, Enochs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. USA
as 4:2022cv81516
Petitioner:
Phillip Daekwon Miles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert, Boyd, Unit Manager Larry Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Virginia Tech Police Department et al
as 7:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Kadeem Marcus Glover
Defendant:
Virginia Tech Police Department, Ofc. Jared B. Phillips, Mike Whaley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00475
Petitioner:
Phillip Lenard Neal
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Conley v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Phillip Conley
Defendant:
Dr. Mullins and Dr. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Warden of USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00287
Petitioner:
Phillip Lenard Neal
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
