Cases 1 - 10 of 360
Jacques, Patrick v. J. Brown et al
as 7:2024cv00684
Defendant:
Lt. Brad Burn, S. Scott, Lt. Gayheart and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Huffman v. Hensley et al
as 7:2024cv00671
Defendant:
R. Carter and A. Hensley
Plaintiff:
Jullian A. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Hartman et al
as 7:2024cv00673
Defendant:
Officer Derek Hartman, Judge Rupen R. Shah and Trooper Andrew J. Garasimowicz
Plaintiff:
Samuel Clay Reed, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hicks et al
as 7:2024cv00653
Defendant:
Warden Tikki N. Hicks, Officer M. Hagy and Chadwick S. Dotson
Plaintiff:
Terrance R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00634
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Deans v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Donshea O. Deans, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark E. Engelke, R. Brock, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Jullian A. Huffman
Defendant:
Officer R. Hall, Major Brian Parks and Master Officer Wheele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fordham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00566
Defendant:
J. Dignus, A. Reynolds, R. Cochrane and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamar Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Fogle et al
as 7:2024cv00575
Defendant:
R. Fogle, Uken Shank and C. Hutzler
Plaintiff:
William Javon Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Pocahontas State Correctional Center et al
as 7:2024cv00443
Defendant:
C. Patterson, C. Smailling, Mr. Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
