Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Crowe-Jackson v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ciara M. Crowe-Jackson
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Jackson
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Washington v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Daryl Vincent Xzavier Washington and Darryl Washington
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Ledford, Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Jennifer S. Jackson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brown v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Denrick Eric Brown, Demmerick Eric Brown and Demmerick E. Brown
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David A. Robinson, George M. Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 7:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Jackson
as 7:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Saunders Milis Franklin and Samuel Miles Franklin
Respondent:
Latris Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Dameron et al
as 7:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neil Jackson
Defendant:
D. Dameron, Dr. K. Smith and Augusta Correctional Center Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Clear et al
as 7:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory Jackson
Defendant:
Steve Clear, Brian Parks, Dr. Holbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Unknown
as 7:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
James Leonard Jackson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
