Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Young v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Kareem Al-Jamal Young
Defendant:
Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Adams v. Osborne et al
as 7:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Heather A. Osborne, M.D. Powers, T. Leedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00468
Petitioner:
Hassan Sharif Ali
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Waldron v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Rondell Waldron
Defendant:
J.C. Streeval, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Young v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00388
Petitioner:
Kareem Al-Jamal Young
Respondent:
Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Thomas Alexander Davis, III
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keitt v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00299
Petitioner:
Keycon Deonte Keitt
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Estes v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Estes
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Greenrock Correctional Center, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merchant v. Philips et al
as 7:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Pedro Bobby Merchant
Defendant:
Officer C. Philips, Warden J.C. Steeval and Mr. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00138
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
