Cases 21 - 30 of 270
Harvey v. Irvin et al
as 7:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Justin Riley Harvey
Defendant:
Unknown, Captain Irvin, Lt. Dull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Javon Lamont Arrington
Defendant:
Sgt. Hall, Sgt. Boles and Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Shawn White
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Sol D. Burke
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christian v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Zane Christian
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Towns v. Nunley, et al
as 7:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Jamie Towns
Respondent:
Unknown, Cory Nunley and Colette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Craig Bailey
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minor v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Antoine L. Minor
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moten v. Metropolitan Police Department of District of Columbia et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Moten
Defendant:
Metropolitan Police Department of District of Columbia, Randy Griffin, Commander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
