Cases 21 - 30 of 25,114
Cruey v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail - Tazewell
as 7:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
David Lee Cruey, II
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail - Tazewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Unit Manager B. Smith and Sergeant EC Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hehl v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Hehl
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MacCloskey v. Truist Bank et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Sean MacCloskey
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Safeguard Properties Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Joyce Theresa Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Huffman v. Parks
as 7:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Jullian Huffman and Julian Huffman
Respondent:
Major Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PPI/TimeZero, Inc. v. Zenith Firearms, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
PPI/TimeZero, Inc.
Defendant:
Zenith Firearms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tipold v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Rosa C. Tipold
Defendant:
Tony Wayne Ross and Stephanie Dowdy Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Barnes v. Jessee et al
as 7:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Barnes
Defendant:
Leah Jessee, Kevin Fox, J. Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
