Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Fahringer v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Justin Godfrey Fahringer
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
VA Doc Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel L. Taylor
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson and Mrs. Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Estes
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipford v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Keon Deshea Lipford
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Proffitt v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Proffitt
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Warden R. Younce, Sgt. Speas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Amee Duncan, Johnny B. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00743
Petitioner:
Dayomic J. Smith
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jermaine Saunders
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Mrs. Bethany and A.S. Harrison
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
