Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Riches v. Childers
as 7:2008cv00163
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Charles Childers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. L-3 Communications Corp et al
as 7:2008cv00160
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
L-3 Communications Corp and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Joyner-Kersee et al
as 7:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Jackie Joyner-Kersee and Paula Newby-Fraser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Markson-Katz et al
as 7:2008cv00153
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Deborah Markson-Katz, Penelope Weiss and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Dickinson et al
as 7:2008cv00155
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Boonsri Dickinson, Bob Guccione, Jr. and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Costas
as 7:2008cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Bob Costas and Marv Albert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Forbes et al
as 7:2008cv00158
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Malcolm Steve Forbes, Special Housing Unit and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Hutchinson et al
as 7:2008cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Archibald Hutchinson and Kasey Kahne
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Hopkins et al
as 7:2008cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Bernard Hopkins and Joe Calzaghe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Malakar et al
as 7:2008cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
SanJaya Malakar and Pavarotti
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
