Cases 61 - 70 of 129
George v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
Eliston F. George
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, L.W. Huffman, Randy C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drew v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00331
Petitioner:
Troy Dewyon Drew
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bilal v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Jawwaad S. Bilal
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson and Gary Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muwwakkil v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kamal S. Muwwakkil
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Larry Huffman, John S. Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeMoulin v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00295
Petitioner:
Eric T. DeMoulin
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rymarz v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00276
Petitioner:
John Frank Rymarz
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith et al v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00266
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee Smith, Geronimo Muhammad, Wali El-Shabazz and others
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Linda Shear, John Jabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentley v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Octavius Bentley
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson and John C. Jabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00250
Petitioner:
Robert Neal Hicks
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fitts v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00245
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Fitts
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
