Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Stout v. Hobbs et al
as 7:2011cv00482
Defendant:
Mrs. Fields, Michael Frame, Mr. Goode and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah K. Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00358
Defendant:
"Brian" (unknown), Sgt. Bray, Director and others
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watlington v. Pruitt et al
as 7:2011cv00353
Defendant:
Clarance Davis, Frank Mardavich, Tommy Pruitt and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Jerome Watlington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00026
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Trena Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Halter v. Walker et al
as 7:2011cv00269
Plaintiff:
Daniel Norbert Halter
Defendant:
NRADC Staff and Sgt. P. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beatty v. Carolina Tank Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Beatty
Defendant:
Carolina Tank Lines, Inc. and Chad E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Strickland v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00246
Defendant:
"Brian", Sgt. Bray, Harold Clark and others
Interested Party:
Office Of The Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00495
Defendant:
Harold Clerk and Gene M. Johnson
Petitioner:
Chauncey Laurent Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Service Corporation International et al
as 4:2010cv00048
Defendant:
Jane D. Jones, Gwen Petteway, Thomas Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Juanita Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Joyce v. Byers et al
as 7:2010cv00375
Defendant:
Lt. Bland, C/O Byers, Sgt. Firth and others
Plaintiff:
Tesha Camelle Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
