Cases 1 - 10 of 25,179
Huffman v. Huff et al
as 7:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant:
Neil Huff, Jennifer Lester, Brett Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russini v. Virginia DOC
as 7:2024cv00388
Petitioner:
Jennifer M. Russini
Respondent:
Virginia DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid v. Employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Reid
Defendant:
Employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Poole et al
as 7:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
CO Poole and CO Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Helton
as 7:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Huffman
Defendant:
Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Teresa H. Roberson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Abdussalaam v. The State of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
Munir-Ibn Sami Abdussalaam
Respondent:
The State of Virginia, Amherst County Adult Detention Center and Appomattox Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
Michael Alonzo Robinson, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlisle v. SMS Group S.p.A.,
as 7:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Nevitt Carlisle
Defendant:
SMS Group S.p.A.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Coogan v. Innovative Refrigeration Systems, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Stacy Coogan
Defendant:
Innovative Refrigeration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
