Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell et al v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell, Tyler Bly, Joshua Clamp and others
Defendant:
David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Meyer
as 7:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Lamar Thomas
Defendant:
William C. Meyer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Lockriagh et al
as 7:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Saunders Miles Franklin
Defendant:
Superintendant Lockriagh, C/O Allen, Dottie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Angna et al
as 7:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
C/O Angna, Sgt. Barksdale, Lt. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Allen et al
as 7:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
C/O Allen, Lt. Bay, Lt. Brogran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Warden et al
as 7:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden, Harold Clarke and Kyle Rosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 7:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FA D.O.C., Kyle Rosch and VADOC Director Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, U.S. District Court Roanoke Division, Elizabeth Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
