Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cobbs v. Walmart
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Cobbs
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Sims v. Akers et al
as 7:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jonah Dwight Sims
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Akers, Correctional Officer J. Barnett, Correctional Officer A.G. Tompa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Haug et al
as 7:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Raymond Michael Cobb
Defendant:
Superintendant Hoag, Lisa Ferguson, Lt. Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caricofe v. Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail et al
as 7:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Bryan R. Hutcheson, Michael Cobb and Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Caricofe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Wang et al
as 7:2020cv00704
Defendant:
Melvin Davis, T. Cobbs, Jeffrey N. Dillman and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbs v. Lynchburg Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Lynchburg Adult Detention Center and Timothy E. Trent
Plaintiff:
Joseph McClain Cobbs and Michael Thomas Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Davis et al
as 7:2019cv00277
Defendant:
K. Ganey, Captain Zawhorodny, T. Cobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Edwards Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00401
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Henry Ponton, Lawrence Wang and others
Plaintiff:
William T. Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sink v. Wang et al
as 7:2018cv00350
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jason Sink
Defendant:
P. Betterton, T. Cobbs, L. Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Diana W. Cobbs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
