Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Pope v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00357
Petitioner: Jered C. Pope
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff: Deonta J. Hicks
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, David Anderson, Joseph D. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicklin v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00330
Petitioner: Mondale Leon Hicklin
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00329
Petitioner: Elwood Shelton
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner: Alexander Adames
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00315
Plaintiff: Kenneth Jennings
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, Mack A. Bailey, Jr., Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00298
Plaintiff: Kevin A. Watson
Defendant: M. Hamilton, K.D. Ramey, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff: Wilbert Smith
Defendant: R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Crout et al
as 7:2024cv00289
Plaintiff: Daniel T. Lipscomb
Defendant: Eric Crout, Kristen Haight and Chad Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00282
Plaintiff: Micah Smith
Defendant: Director Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Major Jeremy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?