Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Douglas v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00238
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, John Garman, Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont O. Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Wade et al
as 7:2011cv00191
Defendant:
Sergeant T. Adams, Corporal Barrowman, K. Crowder-Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00185
Defendant:
K. Austin, Sgt. Baily, Mrs. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottrell v. Jabe et al
as 7:2010cv00505
Defendant:
Investigator T. Adams, Lt. J. Artrip, Sgt. L. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottrell v. Jabe et al
as 7:2010cv00439
Defendant:
Inv. T. Adams, Lt. J. Artrip, Sgt. L. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hale et al
as 7:2009cv00385
Plaintiff:
Terry J. Moore
Defendant:
T. Hale, S. Harrison, K. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Ray et al
as 7:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
Harold L. Waller
Defendant:
T. Ray and B. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Eric Madsen, Duncan Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 7:2008cv00571
Plaintiff:
Donald Cornelius Cook
Defendant:
Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, T. Ray, Gene Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Osbourne v. Harless et al
as 7:2007cv00387
Plaintiff:
Derwin A. Osbourne
Defendant:
P Harless, R. Deel, T. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
