Cases 91 - 100 of 933
Velez v. Key
as 2:2022cv00100
Petitioner:
Eddie Velez
Respondent:
James R Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05079
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Rob M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 1:2022cv03078
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Department of Corrections of AHCC et al
as 2:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Kirk Williams
Respondent:
Department of Corrections of AHCC and Attorney James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Pedro Machuca Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barrett v. Key
as 2:2022cv00059
Petitioner:
Darrick L Barrett
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dick v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2022cv00079
Petitioner:
Melissa S Dick
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blakely v. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Ralph Howard Blakely
Respondent:
Rob Jackson and Robert W Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. State of Washington
as 1:2022cv03051
Petitioner:
John R Demos
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finch v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Emanuel L Finch, Sr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
