Cases 91 - 100 of 1,986
Dodd v. Borg et al
as 2:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Clifton Dodd
Defendant:
Brent Borg and Frank Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villa-Martinez v. Yakima County Jail Administration et al
as 1:2023cv03133
Plaintiff:
Cristobal Villa-Martinez
Defendant:
Yakima County Jail Administration and Yakima County Jail Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Splond v. Moran et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Splond
Defendant:
Moran, Howard and Warden Gabriela Najara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toumbou v. Stockwell et al
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Abdoulaye Toumbou
Defendant:
William Stockwell, Waldo, Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Sams et al
as 2:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Doug Sams, Armando Heredia and Kristi Davis-Ludy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. County of Benton
as 4:2023cv05099
Plaintiff:
John C Fox and Christopher Simpson Fox
Defendant:
County of Benton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worley v. Coxen
as 1:2023cv03099
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Luccerretta Worley
Defendant:
Lt Ernest Coxen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carruthers Washington v. WCC/WCF/Custody Staff & Offenders
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Mrs Eye Keyla My Carruthers Washington
Defendant:
WCC/WCF/Custody Staff & Offenders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Kaczmark et al
as 4:2023cv05092
Plaintiff:
Josiah Harris
Defendant:
MD J Kaczmark, MD W West, MD H Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Roehm et al.
as 4:2023cv05102
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Valdez
Defendant:
Brittnie E Roehm, Eric Eisinger, Brad Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
