Cases 21 - 30 of 1,529
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC dba AT&T Mobility v. City of Walla Walla
as 4:2023cv05162
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
City of Walla Walla
Intervenor Defendant:
Barbara Knudson and Everett Knudson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
White v. Becerra
as 2:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Stephen White
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Holeman et al v. West et al
as 1:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A Holeman and Yanxia Li
Defendant:
Jonathan West, U S Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Spokane County v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv00324
Defendant:
Evernorth Health Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CraneTech Inc v. Richardson et al
as 2:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
CraneTech Inc
Defendant:
Adam David Richardson and Northwest Integrity Crane LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Husayn v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Al-Abidin Muhammad Zayn, Abu Zubaydah and Zayn Al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn
Defendant:
James Elmer Mitchell, John Bruce Jessen, John Jessen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350 Alien Tort Statute
Sullivan, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, v. A & T Financial Services et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Dianne Sullivan, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Defendant:
A & T Financial Services and Clearpath Debt Relief
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sullivan v. A & T Financial Services
as 2:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Dianne Sullivan
Defendant:
A & T Financial Services doing business as Clearpath Debt Relief and Clearpath Debt Relief
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
