Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hudnall et al v. City of Pasco et al
as 4:2023cv05168
Plaintiff:
Sheila Hudnall and Jon Hudnall
Defendant:
City of Pasco, Pasco Police Department, Pasco Police Department Chief Ken Roske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv05287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc
as 1:2014cv03162
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
In Re: Search of 2000 Fort Simcoe Road, White Swan, Washington
as 2:2011mc00008
Movant:
King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc , Mountain Tobacco , Delbert Wheeler and others
Respondent:
USA
King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc. et al v. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau et al
as 2:2011cv03038
Plaintiff:
King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc , Delbert Wheeler and Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation
Defendant:
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, John J Manfreda, United States Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank Ltd et al
as 2:2010mc00007
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Stanford International Bank Ltd, Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management LLC and others
Receiver:
Ralph S Janvey
Borton & Sons Inc v. Washington Apple Distributing Service et al
as 2:2007cv03054
Plaintiff:
Borton & Sons Inc
Defendant:
Washington Apple Distributing Service, Melvin R King, Jr, Jane Doe King and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
