Cases 141 - 150 of 3,568
Marshall v. Maitland
as 2:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Tyler Leslie Marshall
Defendant:
T Maitland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monson v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2023cv05118
Petitioner:
Donald Craig Monson
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuevas v. Psoinos et al
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Moses Cuevas
Defendant:
Daniel Psoinos, Eric Carpenter, Amdar Momeni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winterer v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
Jared Winterer
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morisette v. State of Washington
as 4:2023cv05135
Petitioner:
Christopher Morisette
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2023cv05113
Plaintiff:
Robert J Hill
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair, Tyler Tompkins, Billie Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bautista v. State of Washington et al
as 1:2023cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Bautista
Defendant:
State of Washington, Yakima County Jail and Yakima County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Eric Townsel
Defendant:
Kenneth Sawyer, David Kenney, Sandra Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Spokane County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv05116
Plaintiff:
Roger Wayne Romero
Defendant:
Spokane County Jail and Spokane Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
