Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Nichols et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Robert Jesse Hill
Defendant:
Marianne Nichols, Vicky M Dalton, Lori Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Anderson
as 4:2021cv05144
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Michael D Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. State of Idaho et al
as 2:2020cv00075
Respondent:
US Federal Court of Spokane WA, State of Idaho and Nez Perce Tribal Court
Petitioner:
Lance Charles Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. State of Washington
as 4:2019cv05266
Respondent:
State of Washington
Petitioner:
Robert L Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pendleton v. Spokane City of et al
as 2:2018cv00267
Defendant:
Ernest Wuthrich, Spokane City Prosecutors Office, Terri Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie C Pendleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livermore v. Tonhofer et al
as 4:2018cv05075
Plaintiff:
Glen A Livermore
Defendant:
Debra Tonhofer, John Smith, Robert Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Russell et al
as 2:2017cv00412
Defendant:
James Key , Joseph Luce , Scott Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hellums v. Campbell et al
as 1:2017cv03138
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Hellums
Defendant:
Edward Campbell, Christopher Mequet, Shane Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Washington State Department of Corrections, et al.
as 4:2017cv05110
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections , Kevin Bovenkamp and John and Jane 1-20 Does
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
