Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Beckham v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00176
Petitioner:
Casey D Beckham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. New Casey's LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones
Defendant:
New Casey's LLC and Traveler's Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Christopher v. Renewable Energy Systems Americas, Inc., et al
as 2:2016cv00030
Defendant:
Siemens Energy Inc and Renewable Energy Systems Americas Inc
Plaintiff:
Casey Christopher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CASE NUMBER NOT USED, TRANSFERED TO SPOKANE
as 1:2016cv03016
Defendant:
Siemens Energy Inc and Renewable Energy Systems Americas Inc
Plaintiff:
Casey Christopher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Greer v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Casey Allen Greer
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hartinger, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
as 2:2015cv00265
Plaintiff:
Casey Hartinger , BJH, a minor child, by and through Casey Hartinger, authorized representative and BRH, a minor child, by and through Casey Hartinger, authorized representative
Defendant:
United States of America, Joshua Wentz and Matthew Phillipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Fjeld v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Casey A Fjeld
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wortham v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00345
Plaintiff:
Casey L Wortham
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sheldon v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03030
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Casey Blair Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Olds v. Coyote Ridge Corrections Center et al
as 2:2011cv05096
Plaintiff:
Darrel C Olds, Jr
Defendant:
Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, Jeff Uttecht, Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
