Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Farley v. Sisliyan et al
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Karen H Farley and Calvin Farley
Defendant:
Aram Sisliyan, Lilit Sargsyan and Doe Defendants 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Contreras v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Ryanne H Contreras
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lidstrom et al v. Scotlynn Commodities Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Arlin K Lidstrom and Laverne Lidstrom
Defendant:
Scotlynn Commodities Inc and Ying H Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Lidstrom et al v. Scotlynn Commodities Inc et al
as 4:2023cv05144
Plaintiff:
Arlin K Lidstrom and Laverne Lidstrom
Defendant:
Scotlynn Commodities Inc and Ying H Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Day v. Stupey et al
as 2:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Daniel Day
Defendant:
Melody Stupey, H Alijagic and CRC Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Townsel v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Eric Townsel
Defendant:
Kenneth Sawyer, David Kenney, Sandra Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Kaczmark et al
as 4:2023cv05092
Plaintiff:
Josiah Harris
Defendant:
MD J Kaczmark, MD W West, MD H Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv03028
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lee Barrett
Defendant:
S Johnson, Lisa Rapp, H Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
