Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Morris v. Mabus
as 3:2014cv05320
Plaintiff:
Lowell V Morris
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Secretary of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2013cv05444
Plaintiff:
Michael J Collins
Defendant:
State of Washington , State of Washington Department of L&I , Maria I Mcbride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strick v. Pitts et al
as 3:2011cv05110
Defendant:
Doug Pitts , Todd Saunders , Chris Glenn and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Little v. Martin-Morris et al
as 2:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brenda Joyce Little
Defendant:
Harium Martin-Morris , Kay Blume-Smith , Michael DeBell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NOT USED
as 2:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Elias T Samaha, John Morris, Ralph Robertson and others
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samaha v. Washington State Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2010cv00223
Plaintiff:
Elias T Samaha
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Transportation, John Morris, Ralph Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCarthy et al v. Barrett et al
as 3:2009cv05120
Plaintiff:
Thomas McCarthy, Phan Nguyen and Elizabeth Rivera Goldstein
Defendant:
James Barrett, Paul Jagodinski, Alan Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
