Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdullah-El v. King County Municipal Court et al
as 2:2014cv01437
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Abdullah-El
Defendant:
King County Municipal Court, Snohomish County Municipal Court, Peter S Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2013cv02161
Plaintiff:
Cullen M. Hankerson
Defendant:
Department of Risk Management , Greg Pressel and Mary Ellen Combo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Luzunaris v. Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv05637
Plaintiff:
Cindy Luzunaris
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. , County of Kitsap , Keith Batts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2013cv01332
Plaintiff:
Cindy Luzunaris
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Management , Inc., County of Kitsap and Keith Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Seattle Police Officers Guild et al v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Seattle Police Officers Guild and Seattle Police Management Association
Defendant:
City of Seattle and Merrick Bobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
