Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Annu El v. Sea Mar Kent Medical Clinic
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Zebelum Anna El, Zebelum Willis and Zebelum Annu El
Defendant:
Sea Mar Kent Medical Clinic and Sandy Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Martinez v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05919
Plaintiff:
Karen Martinez
Defendant:
Pierce County, Kim DeMarco, Sandi Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Martinez v. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board et al
as 3:2018cv05593
Plaintiff:
Christina Martinez
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Sandy Brown, Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felix et al v. Group Health of Washington et al
as 2:2011cv01974
Plaintiff:
Nathan Felix and Robin Felix
Defendant:
Group Health of Washington, Group Health Cooperative, Susan Egaas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Aberdeen School District No. 5 et al
as 3:2011cv05932
Plaintiff:
Janet Doe and Mary Roe
Defendant:
Aberdeen School District No. 5 , Martin W Kay , David Tobin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Supanich v. Rundle et al
as 3:2010cv05008
Plaintiff:
Mark Supanich
Defendant:
Kevin Rundle, Jane Doe Rundle, Sandy Pedigo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Schmidt v. Children's Protective Services et al
as 3:2009cv05150
Plaintiff:
Julie Schmidt
Defendant:
Children's Protective Services, Steven Becker, Sandy Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
